Aaron Siri

Managing Partner

Aaron Siri is the Managing Partner of Siri & Glimstad LLP and has extensive experience in a wide range of complex civil litigation matters, including acting as counsel for clients in multiple disputes exceeding one billion dollars. Representative matters by subject area on which Mr. Siri has worked include:


Mr. Siri has extensive experience litigating civil rights cases involving informed consent and parental rights with regard to mandated medical products. Examples include:

  • Successfully challenging an illegal flu shot requirement in Massachusetts;
  • Deposing leading vaccinologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists and pediatricians, including the world’s leading vaccinologist;
  • Petitioning the International Criminal Court for UNICEF’s participation in the deaths of children from DTP vaccine;
  • Successfully securing the removal of false information regarding COVID-19 vaccines from state-run social media;
  • Representing a University of California medical professor against his university for requiring him to receive a COVID-19 vaccine even though he previously had COVID-19, in a lawsuit supported by an expert declaration signed by nine medical/health professors at the University of California;
  • Petitioning to require proper studies of HepB vaccines given to babies;
  • Challenging the DOJ’s opinion regarding mandating emergency use products;
  • Successfully challenging the exclusion of an unvaccinated disabled child from school;
  • Challenging a D.C. law that permits minors 11 years and older to obtain a vaccine without parental consent;
  • Obtaining production of over 3,000 emails sent by Dr. Anthony Fauci regarding COVID-19 and recently suing the NIH regarding sworn testimony by Dr. Fauci to support his claims regarding U.S. funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Lab.

Mr. Siri has been counsel of record on numerous class action matters seeking justice for individuals that have been wronged by large corporations. The following are a few examples:

  • Recovered over $11 million from New York City’s reputed largest excavation and foundation company based on alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to the management of an ESOP (Gatto, et al. v. Sentry Services, Inc. et al., No. 13-cv-05721-RMB-GWG (S.D.N.Y.));
  • Appointed class counsel in a case alleging breaches of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) which resulted in a settlement of $10,500,000 (Thomas v. Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp., 15-cv-3194 (S.D. Cal.));
  • Appointed class counsel in case regarding alleged breach of the TCPA which resulted in a settlement of $25,000,000 in cash and millions of dollars in free service (Buchanan v. Sirius XM, 17-cv-0728 (N.D. Texas)); and
  • Co-lead trial counsel in an ESOP class action matter involving alleged breaches of fiduciary duty which resulted in a total recovery of approximately $2.5 million (Kindle v. Dejana, No. 14-cv-6784 (E.D.N.Y.)).
  • Successfully obtained dismissal of an action claiming purported ownership of three large parcels in Astoria, Queens, recently sold for approximately $50 million, upon which there is a commenced $1.5 billion redevelopment project (Compurun, Inc. d/b/a Rainbow Prime Products v. Famitech Inc. et al., Index No. 708713/2014 (Queens Sup. Ct.));
  • Represented BVI based company in trial court and appellate practice regarding an action seeking $16 million based on purported breaches of contract and fiduciary duty related to the construction of a steel plant in the Republic of Kazakhstan (Garthon Business Inc. et al. v. Stein et al., Index No. 653715/2014 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.));
  • Represent not-for-profit New York hospital in 24 different litigations regarding demutualization of a medical malpractice insurance company by Berkshire Hathaway and to date successfully recovered payments of more than $2 million (Wyckoff Heights Medical Center v. Cadot, No. 500012/2019 (Kings Sup. Ct.))
  • Successfully disqualified a Spanish yacht club and qualified an American yacht club as the challenger for the America’s Cup as well as numerous successful subsequent contempt motions (Golden Gate Yacht Club v. Societe Nautique De Geneve, 18 Misc. 3d 1111(A), 856 N.Y.S.2d 24 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007) order reinstated 12 N.Y.3d 248 (2009));
  • Commenced Article 78 petition related to revising the system by which approximately one billion dollars is allocated among the N.Y.C. Dep’t of Education’s school busing contractors which resulted in an expedited settlement for the client (Amboy Bus. Co.. v. Klein, et al., Index No. 105004/2010 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.));
  • Obtained temporary restraining orders prohibiting the further movement of approximately 35,000 pounds of cashews which quickly resulted in favorable settlements (Ultra Trading International Ltd. v. Intimex Group Joint Stock Co., No. 651672/2014 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.); Ultra Trading International Ltd. v. Phuong Duy Co. Ltd, No. 655777/2016 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.));
  • Successfully upheld Caesars Bahamas’ right to withdraw from a project that was in the process of developing the largest casino resort in the Caribbean (Caesars Bahamas Inv. Corp. v. Baha Mar Joint Venture Holdings Ltd., 75 A.D.3d 419, 420 (1st Dep’t 2010));
  • Initiated action against the seller, shipper, logistics company and freight forwarder regarding the conversion of over 3,000 high-end watches which resulted in a favorable settlement (Delta Sales Group Co., Inc. v. Cargo Logistics Network Co. et al., No. 1:12-cv-03751-RJS (S.D.N.Y.));
  • Represented the leaseholder of the retail portions of the World Trade Center in an arbitration related to insurance coverage arising out of the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001;
  • Represented victims in six separate adversarial proceeding seeking non-dischargeability of various debts arising from various complicated financial transactions and which resulted in judgments totaling over $5 million (Adv. Nos. 13-08321; 13-08323; 13-08324; 13-08219; 13-08218; and 13-08220 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.));
  • Successfully instituted action alleging the breach of a distribution agreement against one of the world’s largest food manufacturers that resulted in a confidential settlement agreement (Adamba Imports International, Inc. v. Kraft Foods, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-00729-SJ-VVP (E.D.N.Y.));
  • Successfully brought action to recover millions of dollars converted by a broker-dealer involving a complex series of transactions which froze all assets of an alleged broker-dealer and compelled disclosure of financial documentation revealing the conversion of these funds (Bak et al. v. Sledziejowski et al., No. 022232/2012 (Kings Sup. Ct.));
  • Represent publicly traded international Indian based technology company in action to recover more than $182 million owed on alleged bond default and successfully defeating motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint (Pala Assets Holdings Ltd v. Rolta, LLC, No. 652798/2018, 2019 WL 2929558 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.));
  • Defended against an action claiming purported majority ownership in an entity which purchased two condominium projects in Florida for over $16 million, which included a precedent setting interlocutory appeal to the Third District Court of Appeals which clarified the standard in Florida for maintaining a lis pendens (LED Trust, LLC, et al. v. Schwartz, et al., Case No. 2011-35999-CA-01 (Miami-Dade County Cir. Ct.)); and
  • Served as counsel for former major kosher poultry manufacturer against the nation’s largest kosher poultry manufacturer in claim seeking millions in damages that resulted in a confidential settlement (MVP Kosher Foods LLC v. Empire Kosher Poultry, Inc., 14-CV-6072 (E.D.N.Y.)).

Prior to founding Siri & Glimstad, Mr. Siri was a litigation attorney at Latham & Watkins for over five years.  Before Latham, Mr. Siri clerked for the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Israel (Aharon Barak) from 2004-2005 where he advised the Chief Justice of relevant American, English (including Commonwealth Countries such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) and International Law precedents for cases of first impression, including in the areas of entity taxation, fiduciary duties, adoption, wills, bankruptcy and corporate liability, as well as the international law implications of Israel’s planned removal, by force or otherwise, of approximately 8,500 of its citizens from the Gaza Strip/West Bank.

Mr. Siri has also been involved in various pro-bono matters, including representation of asylum applicants, housing discrimination victims (including Dunlap et al. v. Jacobs et al., 1:06-cv-06160-CM (S.D.N.Y.)), and non-profit organizations in tenant-landlord disputes, as well as being chosen as a Frank C. Newman delegate to present a paper he authored and speak before the United Nations Human Rights Sub-Commission.

Mr. Siri earned his law degree at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law where he received four Prosser Prizes and ten High Honors. He was also the Editor-in-Chief and founder of the Berkeley Business Law Journal, which he developed into a nationally recognized publication, ranked in the top 10 of 132 peer journals.

Prior to law school, Mr. Siri was an auditor at Arthur Andersen LLP, where he examined internal controls and audited corporate documents for private and public micro-cap technology companies. Mr. Siri is a Certified Public Accountant.


  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
  • Certified Public Accountant (2000-Present)
  • American Bar Association
  • New York State Licensed Attorney (2005-Present)
  • Empire State Counsel, New York State Bar Association
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (2006-Present)
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (2006-Present)
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims (2012-Present)
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York (2015-Present)
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona (2020-Present)
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (2020-Present)

Full Disclaimer

Attorney Advertising Disclaimer: The material on this website has been prepared and is copyrighted by Siri & Glimstad LLP (“SG”). The material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The material is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up to date.  Information provided by or cited to third parties does not necessarily reflect the opinions of SG or any of its attorneys or clients.

Jurisdictions In Which Our Attorneys Are Licensed To Practice: SG has an office in New York. Members of the firm practice in federal district courts throughout the United States. SG attorneys are licensed to practice in the state(s) enumerated on their individual attorney profiles.

Disclaimer On Contract Formation: Your receipt of the information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, a contract for representation by SG. This information is not intended to substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. No person should act or rely on any information in this site without seeking the advice of an attorney. Also, please be aware that the sending of an e-mail message to SG does not contractually obligate SG to represent you as your attorney. SG cannot serve as your counsel in any matter unless you and our firm expressly agree, in writing, that we will serve as your attorney.

Statute Of Limitations Notice: You should be aware that the Statute of Limitations (the deadline imposed by law within which you may bring a lawsuit) may severely limit the time remaining for you to file any potential claims you may have.

This Is An Advertisement: This website may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Independent Investigation: All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer’s credentials and ability being considered, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Our attorneys are not certified as specialists in any particular field of law.

Siri & Glimstad Does Not Offer Any Guarantees Of Case Results: Every legal matter is different. The outcome of each legal case depends upon many factors, including the facts of the case, and no attorney can guarantee a positive result in any case. Any testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Notice On Contingent Fees: SG represents clients in certain cases on a contingent fee basis. In such cases, no fee will be charged in the absence of recovery. However, in the event of an adverse verdict or decision, the contingent fee litigant may be responsible for court costs.

Statement Of Client’s Rights: The Appellate Divisions of the State of New York have enacted a Statement of Client’s Rights and Statement of Client’s Responsibilities which are available at www.nysba.org  If you have any questions about the content of either of these documents, please let us know.

Limitation on Liability: SG assumes no liability for the use or interpretation of information contained on this website. This publication is provided “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT.

This Website Does Not Provide Medical Diagnosis or Advice: The content provided on the website, such as documents, text, graphics, images, videos, news alerts, pharmaceutical drug recalls, prescription medication history, or information on litigation concerning the foregoing topics, or other materials, is for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a physician for diagnosis and treatment of any medical condition or for any questions you may have regarding a health concern. Never disregard professional medical advice, alter a prescription plan in anyway, or delay or refrain from seeking medical advice because of something you have read or seen on the website. Links to other websites are provided for information only. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by SG.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the website may present information about pharmaceutical drug recalls, which is for information purposes only. Such information is not necessarily the most current information on subject and may or may not be updated based on the last information concerning such recalls. Do not make any make any decisions regarding medication or medical providers based on information from the website including but not limited to information we provide about drug recalls.

Image Notice: No persons pictured on this website are clients of SG.

Arbitration: Any and all claims by you arising out of or related to this website or your use thereof may be resolved only through a binding arbitration proceeding to be conducted under the auspices of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association in New York, New York. The arbitration shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York. Both your agreement to arbitrate all controversies, disputes and claims, and the results and awards rendered through the arbitration, will be final and binding on you and may be specifically enforced by legal proceedings. Arbitration will be the sole means of resolving such controversies, disputes and claims, and you waive your rights to resolve such controversies, disputes and claims by court proceedings or any other means. You agree that judgment may be entered on the award in any court of competent jurisdiction and, therefore, any award rendered shall be binding. THE ARBITRATOR MAY NOT CONSOLIDATE MORE THAN ONE PERSON’S CLAIMS, AND MAY NOT OTHERWISE PRESIDE OVER ANY FORM OF A REPRESENTATIVE OR CLASS PROCEEDING. YOU UNDERSTAND THAT BY AGREEING TO ARBITRATION AS A MECHANISM TO RESOLVE ALL CONTROVERSIES, DISPUTES AND CLAIMS BETWEEN US, YOU ARE WAIVING CERTAIN RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO BRING AN ACTION IN COURT, THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL, THE RIGHT TO BROAD DISCOVERY, AND THE RIGHT TO AN APPEAL. YOU UNDERSTAND THAT IN THE CONTEXT OF ARBITRATION, A CASE IS DECIDED BY AN ARBITRATOR (ONE OR MORE), NOT BY A JUDGE OR A JURY. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY DISPUTES BETWEEN YOU AND SG ARE DECIDED BEFORE A COURT, YOU AND SG AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND THAT YOU ARE  YOU ARE GIVING UP YOUR RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE AS A CLASS REPRESENTATIVE OR MEMBER ON ANY CLASS CLAIM YOU MAY HAVE AGAINST US.