Online Privacy and Data Breach Class Actions

The data breach and privacy attorneys of Siri & Glimstad are recognized leaders in the complex area of data breach and privacy litigation. They have proven themselves capable time and time again of successfully stepping in to fill the void, bringing litigation to the doorsteps of companies placing profits before privacy and holding them accountable for their failure to safeguard the highly sensitive information of their customers, students, patients, and employees – everyday, hard-working Americans.

While data breaches and the unauthorized sharing of sensitive information through tracking technologies will inevitably continue to rise and negatively impact individuals across the country, Siri & Glimstad will remain at the forefront of data breach and privacy issues, representing victims young and old to help them collectively enforce their right to privacy.

Data breaches and the unauthorized sharing of personal information through the use of pixels and other tracking technologies are violations of privacy that can result in financial and other harms, such as unauthorized credit card charges, identity theft, and other fraud-related risks. If you receive notice that you have been involved in a data breach, or you think your information is being shared online without your permission, it is imperative that you contact data privacy attorneys who have years of success litigating these issues, as well as a track record of high-value settlements. As threats to our privacy continue to evolve at a rapid pace in this digital age dominated by cyber culture, Siri & Glimstad’s data privacy group continues to develop creative litigation strategies so that your privacy rights may be protected and enforced.

• Wood, et al. v. Gryphon Healthcare, LLC. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Brown, et al. v. Alabama Cardiology Group, P.C. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Cain, et al. v. CGM, Inc. (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• In re: Fortra File Transfer Software Data Security Breach Litigation (Barney appointed as Santa Clara and Brightline Track Lead)
• Pacheco v. Community First Medical Center (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Cooper v. Pierce College District (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• Stinson, et al. v. YUM! Brands, Inc. (Barney appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• Boehles v. Retina Group of Washington (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Boudreaux, et al. v. Systems East, Inc. (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Cowherd, et al. v. My Daily Choice, Inc. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Reichbart, et al. v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• In re UNITE HERE Data Security Incident Litigation (Bean and Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• In re: Vivendi Ticketing US LLC, d/b/a See Tickets Data Security Incident (Bean and Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Wilson, et al. v. Frontier Communications (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• In re DISH Network Data Security Incident Litigation (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Harrison, et al. v. Peco Foods Inc. (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• Noel, et al. v. Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, et al. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Flores, et al. v. South Texas Oncology and Hematology, PLLC (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Gregorio, et al. v. Green Diamond Resource Company (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• In re Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker Data Security Incident Litigation (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• McLean v. Signature Performance, Inc. (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)

Herff Jones Data Breach Litigation
Case No. 1:21-cv-01329 (S.D. Ind.)
Obtained preliminary approval of a class settlement that includes a settlement fund of $4,350,000 and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security. 

Carter, et al. v. Vivendi Ticketing US LLC d/b/a See Tickets
Case No. 8:22-cv-01981 (C.D. Cal.)
Final approval granted, appointing firm as settlement class counsel, in a data breach class action settlement involving 437,310 class members and a $3,000,000 non-reversionary settlement fund.

Armstrong et al. v. Gas South, LLC
Case No. 22106661 (Ga. Sup. Ct., Cobb Cty.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement involving roughly 40,000 class members and valued at over $9 million.

Medina v. Albertsons Companies, Inc.
Case No. 1:23-cv-00480 (D. Del.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement involving 33,000 class members and a $750,000 non-reversionary settlement fund.

In re Sovos Compliance Data Security Incident Litigation
Case No. 1:23-cv-12100-AK (D. Mass.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $3,534,128.50 involving 490,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security improvements.

In re Planet Home Lending, LLC Data Breach
Case No. 3:24-cv-127(KAD) (D. Conn.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $2,425,000 involving 285,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security improvements.

Owens, et al. v. US Radiology Specialists, Inc., et al.
Case No. 22-CVS-17797 (N.C. Sup. Ct., Mecklenburg Cty.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $5,050,000 involving 1,300,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendants to pay for data security improvements.

In re: Vivendi Ticketing US LLC, d/b/a See Tickets Data Security Incident
Case No. 2:23-cv-07498-MWF (DFM)
Obtained preliminary approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $3,250,000 involving 325,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security improvements.