Data Breach Class Actions

Over $150 Million Recovered. Over 30 Million Class Members Compensated.

S&G Partner Tyler Bean Named Class Action Leader

image of push button start for a car with the words car insurance on it

About Data Breach Class Actions

Data breach litigation has expanded considerably in recent years, bringing many new plaintiff firms into the field. Siri & Glimstad’s data breach attorneys have been working in this area for much longer. With decades of combined experience, the firm’s attorneys skillfully navigate a field that remains complex, relatively new, and constantly changing.

Siri & Glimstad’s data breach team has handled hundreds of data breach class actions across the country. Its attorneys have helped develop and advance legal theories and litigation strategies that have produced meaningful results for plaintiffs and class members, including high-value settlements and precedent-setting outcomes.

Data breach cases continue to change along with the technology and security practices at issue. Siri & Glimstad represents victims of all ages in efforts to enforce their rights and hold companies accountable when inadequate data security practices expose personal information.

For many people, the consequences do not end with a breach notification. Deficient security systems can lead to unauthorized charges, identity theft, fraud, or an increased risk that compromised information will be misused later. Individuals who receive notice of a breach, or otherwise have reason to believe their personal information was affected, should consider speaking with experienced data privacy counsel familiar with this area of litigation.

Siri & Glimstad’s data breach team brings extensive experience, strategic insight, and a history of successful outcomes to these cases. As privacy and security threats continue to evolve, the firm develops litigation approaches that respond to the changing ways personal information is collected, stored, and exposed.

Recent Leadership Appointments

  • Cotter v. Waterford Hotel Group, LLC (N. Williams appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Padavick v. Doxa Insurance Holdings LLC. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Brandon v. Diana Health, Inc. (Tolentino appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Harris v. BOK Financial Corporation (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Coleman et al v. OVP Health Care, Inc. (N. Williams appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Mickens v. Pioneer Bank (K. Brian appointed as interim co-lead counsel)
  • Brewster v. Corporation Service Company (K. Brian appointed as interim co-lead counsel)
  • In re Forrestall CPAs Data Security Litigation (N. Williams appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • James v. ASP Unifrax Holdings, Inc. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Schober v. Kannarr Eye Care, LLC (Hilton appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Lauren Youmans et al v. Walker Accounting & Tax Service (N. Williams appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • In re F&P Georgia Manufacturing Data Security Litigation (N. Williams appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • In re Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and TriZetto Provider Solutions, LLC Data Security Breach Litigation (K. Brian appointed to Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
  • William Glade et al v. UFP Technologies, Inc. (Hilton appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Eisenberg et al v. Oak View Group, LLC (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Nealey, et al. v. Internal Medicine of Milford, P.C. (Bean, Hilton & Faircloth appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Ortiz v. St. John’s Riverside Hospital (Tolentino, Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Douglas v. Innovative Scientific Solutions LLC (N. Williams appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Christiansen, et al. v. Clarinda Regional Health Center (Bean, Hilton appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Kelly, et al. v. Valley Eye Associates, LP (Hilton appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Adams, et al. v. Sierra Vista Hospital & Clinics (Hilton appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Jenkins, et al. v. Smyth Companies, LLC (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • DKC Smith v. ASC Ortho Management Company, LLC (K. Brian appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Conyers, et al. v. Hope Health Inc. (N. Williams appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Carver v. Intl. Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174 (G.Williams appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
  • Grove, et al. v. Garden of Life, LLC (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Brown v. Gas Express, LLC (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Fleming, et al. v. O’ Connor Corporation (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Kranz-Mitchell, et al. v. Exelsior Orthopaedics, LLP and Buffalo Surgery Center, LLP (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Creutz, et al. v. Carespring Health Care Management, LLC. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Lataveia Allen v. SRP Federal Credit Union (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
  • Russo v. OP Pharmacy, LLC. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • In re: Landmark Admin LLC Data Incident Litigation (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Wood, et al. v. Gryphon Healthcare, LLC. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Brown, et al. v. Alabama Cardiology Group, P.C. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Cain, et al. v. CGM, Inc. (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
  • In re: Fortra File Transfer Software Data Security Breach Litigation (Barney appointed as Santa Clara and Brightline Track Lead)
  • Pacheco v. Community First Medical Center (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Cooper v. Pierce College District (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
  • Stinson, et al. v. YUM! Brands, Inc. (Barney appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
  • Boehles v. Retina Group of Washington (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Boudreaux, et al. v. Systems East, Inc. (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Cowherd, et al. v. My Daily Choice, Inc. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Reichbart, et al. v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
  • In re UNITE HERE Data Security Incident Litigation (Bean and Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • In re: Vivendi Ticketing US LLC, d/b/a See Tickets Data Security Incident (Bean and Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Wilson, et al. v. Frontier Communications (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • In re DISH Network Data Security Incident Litigation (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Harrison, et al. v. Peco Foods Inc. (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
  • Noel, et al. v. Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, et al. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Flores, et al. v. South Texas Oncology and Hematology, PLLC (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • Gregorio, et al. v. Green Diamond Resource Company (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • In re Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker Data Security Incident Litigation (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
  • McLean v. Signature Performance, Inc. (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)

Notable Settlements

In re Fortra File Transfer Software Data Security Breach Litigation
Case No. 24-md-03090 (S.D. Fla.)
Received final approval for a settlement involving over six million class members and a $20 million non-reversionary settlement fund.

Wilson et al. v. Frontier Communications
Case No. 3 :24-cv-1418 (N.D. Tex.)
Received final approval for a settlement involving 750,000 class members and a $5,640,000 non-reversionary settlement fund.

Corona-Cantu v. Ingo Money, Inc.
Case No. 1:24-cv-03023 (N.D. Ga.)
Received final approval for a settlement involving 27,000 class members and a $1.5 million non-reversionary settlement fund;

In re Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker Data Security Incident Litigation
Case No. 2:24-cv-00146 (D. Me.)
Received final approval for a settlement involving 2 million class members and a $7.25 million non-reversionary settlement fund.

Terrance Rosa, et al. v. Brightline, Inc.
Case No. 24-md-03090 (S.D. Fla.)
Received final approval for a settlement involving over 1 million class members and a $7,000,000 non-reversionary settlement fund.

In re Retina Group of Washington Data Security Incident Litigation
Case No. 8:24-cv-00004 (D. Md.)
Received final approval for a settlement involving 450,000 class members and a $3.6 million non-reversionary settlement fund.

Hefstetler, et al. v. Upstream Rehabilitation, Inc., et al.
Case No. 2024-902563.00 (AL Cir. Ct., Jefferson Cty.)
Received final approval for a settlement involving roughly 545,000 class members and a $4,304,898.50 non-reversionary settlement fund.

Herff Jones Data Breach Litigation
Case No. 1:21-cv-01329 (S.D. Ind.)
Obtained preliminary approval of a class settlement that includes a settlement fund of $4,350,000 and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security.

Carter, et al. v. Vivendi Ticketing US LLC d/b/a See Tickets
Case No. 8:22-cv-01981 (C.D. Cal.)
Final approval granted, appointing firm as settlement class counsel, in a data breach class action settlement involving 437,310 class members and a $3,000,000 non-reversionary settlement fund.

Armstrong et al. v. Gas South, LLC
Case No. 22106661 (Ga. Sup. Ct., Cobb Cty.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement involving roughly 40,000 class members and valued at over $9 million.

Medina v. Albertsons Companies, Inc.
Case No. 1:23-cv-00480 (D. Del.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement involving 33,000 class members and a $750,000 non-reversionary settlement fund.

In re Sovos Compliance Data Security Incident Litigation
Case No. 1:23-cv-12100-AK (D. Mass.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $3,534,128.50 involving 490,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security improvements.

In re Planet Home Lending, LLC Data Breach
Case No. 3:24-cv-127(KAD) (D. Conn.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $2,425,000 involving 285,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security improvements.

Owens, et al. v. US Radiology Specialists, Inc., et al.
Case No. 22-CVS-17797 (N.C. Sup. Ct., Mecklenburg Cty.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $5,050,000 involving 1,300,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendants to pay for data security improvements.

In re: Vivendi Ticketing US LLC, d/b/a See Tickets Data Security Incident
Case No. 2:23-cv-07498-MWF (DFM)
Obtained preliminary approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $3,250,000 involving 325,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security improvements.

In re Hospital Sisters Health System Data Breach Litigation
Case No. 2024CH000043 (Ill. Cir. Ct., Sangamon Cty.)
Received final approval for a settlement involving 868,000 class members and a $7.6 million non-reversionary settlement fund

Siri & Glimstad is actively litigating hundreds of data breach matters on behalf of millions of individuals nationwide, and has recovered over $150 million for impacted data breach victims. If you have received a data breach notice and would like to discuss your options, please contact us.

FREE Class Action Consultation

CONTACT US TODAY TO SEE IF YOU’RE ELIGIBLE FOR COMPENSATION

1-772-SUE-THEM
(783-8436)

Content Reviewed by: Tyler Bean – Data Breach Class Action Lawyer

Mr. Bean is widely regarded as one of the nation’s leading plaintiff-side data privacy litigators, having been recognized as a top-12 litigator under the age of 40 in the country. Mr. Bean’s practice focuses on complex civil litigation and consumer class actions, with a particular emphasis on Data Breach, Internet Surveillance, and Camera Surveillance matters. Over the course of his career, he has played a central role in the successful prosecution of hundreds of data privacy cases, from inception through discovery and final approval, helping to shape outcomes in rapidly evolving areas of law.

This page was last updated on: August 28, 2026