Internet Surveillance Attorneys

Internet surveillance technologies are now built into many websites, often operating in ways that users cannot readily see. Litigation over unlawful tracking, interception, and disclosure of online data has grown with those technologies, creating a highly technical and rapidly developing area of privacy law. Siri & Glimstad’s internet surveillance team handles these cases nationwide.

Our attorneys develop and advance claims involving the unauthorized interception of sensitive electronic communications, the sharing of sensitive information through website analytics and advertising integrations, and inadequate disclosures or defective consent mechanisms. We represent individuals seeking to hold companies accountable for disclosing sensitive information to third parties such as Google, Meta, TikTok, and Microsoft without informed consent. These cases are prosecuted in state and federal courts across the country.

Much of the conduct at issue occurs behind the interface a person actually sees. Pixels, analytics tools, advertising integrations, and other tracking technologies can transmit information to outside companies as people use websites or applications. In these cases, the practical questions often include what information was collected, where it was sent, and whether the user was given a meaningful opportunity to consent.

Businesses increasingly rely on these tools to analyze user behavior, support advertising, and increase profit margins. For individuals, that can mean less control over sensitive information and greater exposure to profiling, targeted advertising based on sensitive characteristics, and other uses of personal data. Siri & Glimstad develops legal theories and litigation strategies aimed at addressing unauthorized collection and third-party sharing that infringes on individual privacy.

Individuals seeking representation in internet surveillance and tracking litigation should consider counsel experienced in complex privacy class actions. Siri & Glimstad’s internet surveillance team is prepared to investigate these matters and litigate them aggressively through resolution.

• Rudnick et al v. Sony Corporation of America et al (S. Singh and T. Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Zeolla et al v. Southern New Hampshire University (S. Singh and T. Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Carter v. MyHeritage (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• McGrath, et al v. Fay Nutrition, LLC, Case No. 1:25-cv-10343 (appointing T. Bean and S. Singh as co-lead counsel)

If you believe a website or mobile app may have tracked or shared sensitive information without meaningful notice or consent, contact Siri & Glimstad to discuss what happened and whether legal options may be available.

A lawsuit seeking class-action status regarding internet surveillance claims is pending or being investigated; nothing here requires you to give up any legal rights.