Before law school, Mr. Moller worked and volunteered for three years in 15 countries throughout Southeast Asia, Oceania, and Africa. While in law school, Mr. Moller clerked at the Mississippi Supreme Court and was on the Law Review. He graduated summa cum laude in 2014 and then clerked for a federal judge at the United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana, where he gained exposure to a large volume of employment discrimination matters, products liability cases, and class action litigation.
Mr. Moller then worked for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from 2015 to 2021, where his practice focused on federal contracts and civil litigation in various administrative courts.
Since joining Siri & Glimstad, Mr. Moller has litigated employment discrimination matters, class actions, and constitutional claims in federal courts across the country, at both the trial and appellate levels.
Admissions
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
- United States District Court, Southern District of Mississippi
- United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
- United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
- United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas
- United States District Court, Western District of Texas
- United States District Court, District of Colorado
- United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
Representative Matters:
- Bosarge. v. Edney, 669 F. Supp. 3d 598 (S.D. Miss. 2023) (prevailed under First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause against Mississippi’s mandatory vaccination policy for schoolchildren)
- Bosch v. Biden, No. 1:23-CV-00018 (M.D. Tenn. 2023) (lawsuit challenging the Biden Administration’s travel ban on unvaccinated non-citizens under the First Amendment and Religious Freedom Restoration Act; travel ban was dropped after lawsuit was filed)
- Thrift v. Drake, No. 2:24-CV-01034 (C.D. Cal. 2024) (obtained permanent injunctive relief under the First Amendment against the University of California at Los Angeles)
- W. Va. Parents for Religious Freedom v. Christiansen, 124 F.4th 304 (4th Cir. 2024) (prevailed on appeal of district court abstention order that required clients to litigate First Amendment claims in state court rather than in federal court)
- Perry v. Marteney, Civil Action No. 2:24-CV-18 (N.D. W.Va., Oct. 15, 2024) (obtained preliminary injunctive relief under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise clause)
- Ream v. Drake, No. 2:24-CV-00189 (C.D. Cal. 2024) (obtained temporary restraining order and permanent injunctive relief under the First Amendment against the University of California at Davis)
- CSIOS Corporation v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bid Protest No. B-419779.1 (achieved full dismissal of contract dispute implicating $100M+ in various federal procurements)
- Netizen Corporation v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bid Protest No. B-41828 (achieved full dismissal of contract dispute implicating an $8.3M federal procurement)
- Harding Enterprises v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, GAO No. B-412453 (achieved full dismissal of bad faith breach of contract claim)
- Truckla, Inc., v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal No. 17-2080 (working alongside the Department of Justice, achieved full dismissal of breach of contract claim)
