Elizabeth Brehm


Elizabeth Brehm graduated from Boston University with a Bachelor of Science and earned her Masters from Long Island University at C.W. Post. She attended Hofstra Law School and obtained a Juris Doctorate, graduating magna cum laude, in 2008.

After law school, Ms. Brehm spent a year at Winston & Strawn LLP where she focused on products liability litigation.  For nine years prior to joining Siri & Glimstad, Ms. Brehm worked for a New York law firm where she focused on antitrust class action lawsuits, health care fraud, and qui tam and whistleblower litigations.

Representative matters include:


  • Representation of the exchange-based class in an antitrust case and the first LIBOR manipulation lawsuit filed on behalf of investors, alleging that defendant banks colluded to misreport and manipulate LIBOR.  This litigation resulted in a partial settlement of over $180 million.
  • Co-lead counsel on behalf of classes of indirect purchasers in connection with antitrust proceedings against a multinational technology company. The litigations resulted in settlements totaling nearly a billion dollars for consumers in five states.
  • Co-lead counsel on behalf of a proposed class of purchasers of iron pipe fittings for water projects.  This case settled for more than $17.3 million.
  • Representation of indirect purchasers in a price fixing antitrust case alleging that defendant entities conspired to control prices of television and monitor components.


  • Representation of individual silver futures traders alleging manipulation of silver futures spreads.  Achieved a landmark appellate decision in this case establishing pleading standards for monopolization claims in futures markets.

Healthcare fraud

  • Member of court-appointed Discovery Committee Co-Chair for a putative class of direct purchasers of brand name and generic equivalents of an extended release drug against drug manufacturers.  Among the claims, defendants are alleged to have delayed market entry of generic versions and entered into reverse payment settlements.


  • Representation of a whistleblower in a False Claims Act qui tam case alleging that a waste-energy company used improper ash disposal techniques, violative of environmental law.
  • Confidential whistleblower cases in securities and commodities.


  • FLSA claims in arbitration against a popular fast-casual restaurant chain: representation of numerous claimants, former employees of the chain, bringing FLSA claims against the restaurants for unpaid wages.


  • New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Contact Us

Contact Us

200 Park Avenue, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10166
(212) 532-1091
(646) 417-5967

700 S Flower Street, Suite 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 376-3739

20200 West Dixie Highway, Suite 902
Aventura, FL 33180
(786) 244-5660

11201 North Tatum Boulevard, Suite 300
Phoenix, AZ 85028
(602) 806-9975

220 West Congress St., 2nd Floor
Detroit, MI 48226
(313) 251-9161

1340 Poydras Street, Suite 1770
New Orleans, LA 70112
(504) 285-2942


Attorney Advertising Disclaimer: The material on this web site has been prepared and is copyrighted by Siri & Glimstad LLP (“SG”). The material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The material is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up to date.  Information provided by or cited to third parties does not necessarily reflect the opinions of SG or any of its attorneys or clients.

Jurisdictions In Which Our Attorneys Are Licensed To Practice: SG has an office in New York. Members of the firm practice in federal district courts throughout the United States. SG attorneys are licensed to practice in the state(s) enumerated on their individual attorney profiles.

Disclaimer On Contract Formation: Your receipt of the information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, a contract for representation by SG. This information is not intended to substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. No person should act or rely on any information in this site without seeking the advice of an attorney.   Also, please be aware that the sending of an e-mail message to SG does not contractually obligate SG to represent you as your attorney. SG cannot serve as your counsel in any matter unless you and our firm expressly agree, in writing, that we will serve as your attorney.

Statute Of Limitations Notice: You should be aware that the Statute of Limitations (the deadline imposed by law within which you may bring a lawsuit) may severely limit the time remaining for you to file any potential claims you may have.

This Is An Advertisement: This web site may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Independent Investigation: All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer’s credentials and ability being considered, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Our attorneys are not certified as specialists in any particular field of law.

Siri & Glimstad Does Not Offer Any Guarantees Of Case Results: Every legal matter is different. The outcome of each legal case depends upon many factors, including the facts of the case, and no attorney can guarantee a positive result in any case. Any testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Notice On Contingent Fees: SG represents clients in certain cases on a contingent fee basis. In such cases, no fee will be charged in the absence of recovery. However, in the event of an adverse verdict or decision, the contingent fee litigant may be responsible for court costs.

Statement Of Client’s Rights: The Appellate Divisions of the State of New York have enacted a Statement of Client’s Rights and Statement of Client’s Responsibilities which are available at www.nysba.org  If you have any questions about the content of either of these documents, please let us know.

Image Notice: No persons pictured on this website are clients of SG.