Data Breach Class Actions and Online Privacy

As data breach litigation has grown in prominence, many plaintiff firms have entered the space. Siri & Glimstad’s data breach attorneys, by contrast, have long been helping to shape it. With decades of combined experience, our attorneys are recognized national leaders in this complex, novel, and rapidly evolving area of law.

Siri & Glimstad’s data breach team has been at the forefront of data breach litigation, working on the front lines of hundreds of data breach class actions nationwide. Our attorneys have played a key role in developing and advancing the legal theories and strategies that have driven meaningful results for plaintiffs and class members over the course of many years, including high-value settlements and precedent-setting outcomes.

As data breaches continue to affect individuals across the country, Siri & Glimstad remains committed to leading the charge in protecting consumer privacy. We represent victims of all ages in enforcing their rights and holding companies accountable for inadequate data security practices.

Data breaches caused by deficient security systems can result in significant financial and personal harm, including unauthorized charges, identity theft, and increased risk of fraud. Individuals who receive notice of a data breach or who otherwise have reason to believe their information may have been impacted by a data breach should consult experienced data privacy counsel with a proven track record in this field. Siri & Glimstad’s data breach team brings deep experience, strategic insight, and a history of success to every case, while continuing to develop innovative litigation approaches to address emerging threats in an increasingly digital world.

• Zeolla et al v. Southern New Hampshire University (S. Singh and T. Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Mimbs and Brown, et al. v. Dublin Medical Center (K. Brian appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• Conyers, et al. v. Hope Health Inc. (N. Williams appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Marin, et al. v. Sai Oral Surgery, PLLC (K. Brian appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Carver v. Intl. Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174 (G.Williams appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• Grove, et al. v. Garden of Life, LLC (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Brown v. Gas Express, LLC (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Fleming, et al. v. O’ Connor Corporation (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Kranz-Mitchell, et al. v. Exelsior Orthopaedics, LLP and Buffalo Surgery Center, LLP (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Creutz, et al. v. Carespring Health Care Management, LLC. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Carter v. MyHeritage (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Lataveia Allen v. SRP Federal Credit Union (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• Russo v. OP Pharmacy, LLC. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• In re: Landmark Admin LLC Data Incident Litigation (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Wood, et al. v. Gryphon Healthcare, LLC. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Brown, et al. v. Alabama Cardiology Group, P.C. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Cain, et al. v. CGM, Inc. (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• In re: Fortra File Transfer Software Data Security Breach Litigation (Barney appointed as Santa Clara and Brightline Track Lead)
• Pacheco v. Community First Medical Center (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Cooper v. Pierce College District (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• Stinson, et al. v. YUM! Brands, Inc. (Barney appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• Boehles v. Retina Group of Washington (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Boudreaux, et al. v. Systems East, Inc. (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Cowherd, et al. v. My Daily Choice, Inc. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Reichbart, et al. v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• In re UNITE HERE Data Security Incident Litigation (Bean and Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• In re: Vivendi Ticketing US LLC, d/b/a See Tickets Data Security Incident (Bean and Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Wilson, et al. v. Frontier Communications (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• In re DISH Network Data Security Incident Litigation (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Harrison, et al. v. Peco Foods Inc. (Bean appointed as member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee)
• Noel, et al. v. Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, et al. (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Flores, et al. v. South Texas Oncology and Hematology, PLLC (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• Gregorio, et al. v. Green Diamond Resource Company (Bean appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• In re Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker Data Security Incident Litigation (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)
• McLean v. Signature Performance, Inc. (Barney appointed as interim co-lead class counsel)

Herff Jones Data Breach Litigation
Case No. 1:21-cv-01329 (S.D. Ind.)
Obtained preliminary approval of a class settlement that includes a settlement fund of $4,350,000 and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security. 

Carter, et al. v. Vivendi Ticketing US LLC d/b/a See Tickets
Case No. 8:22-cv-01981 (C.D. Cal.)
Final approval granted, appointing firm as settlement class counsel, in a data breach class action settlement involving 437,310 class members and a $3,000,000 non-reversionary settlement fund.

Armstrong et al. v. Gas South, LLC
Case No. 22106661 (Ga. Sup. Ct., Cobb Cty.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement involving roughly 40,000 class members and valued at over $9 million.

Medina v. Albertsons Companies, Inc.
Case No. 1:23-cv-00480 (D. Del.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement involving 33,000 class members and a $750,000 non-reversionary settlement fund.

In re Sovos Compliance Data Security Incident Litigation
Case No. 1:23-cv-12100-AK (D. Mass.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $3,534,128.50 involving 490,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security improvements.

In re Planet Home Lending, LLC Data Breach
Case No. 3:24-cv-127(KAD) (D. Conn.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $2,425,000 involving 285,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security improvements.

Owens, et al. v. US Radiology Specialists, Inc., et al.
Case No. 22-CVS-17797 (N.C. Sup. Ct., Mecklenburg Cty.)
Obtained final approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $5,050,000 involving 1,300,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendants to pay for data security improvements.

In re: Vivendi Ticketing US LLC, d/b/a See Tickets Data Security Incident
Case No. 2:23-cv-07498-MWF (DFM)
Obtained preliminary approval of a class settlement that includes a non-reversionary settlement fund of $3,250,000 involving 325,000 class members and, separate from the settlement fund, requires the defendant to pay for data security improvements.

Siri & Glimstad is among the nation’s leading firms representing consumers in data breach and privacy class actions. The Firm is actively litigating hundreds of data breach matters on behalf of millions of individuals nationwide, and has recovered over $100 million for impacted data breach victims. If you have received a data breach notice and would like to discuss your options, please contact us.