Brian Rabkin

Associate Attorney

brabkin@sirillp.com
(212) 532-1091

200 Park Avenue
Seventeenth Floor
New York, NY 10166

Admitted in NY

Brian Rabkin is an Associate Attorney at Siri & Glimstad LLP. He has a wide-reaching and diverse background in civil litigation, including consumer class action litigation. His passion as a litigator is rooted in his mission to prevent manufacturers and retailers from falsely advertising products. Mr. Rabkin had negotiated settlements in numerous food labeling cases, compelling manufacturers to change product labeling and compensate consumers. Mr. Rabkin’s interest in science and technology, and his specialization in those fields, have resulted in his recovering millions of dollars in settlements in cases against car and food manufacturers. In addition to driving consumer fraud cases to successful conclusions, Mr. Rabkin has extensive experience conducting discovery and motion practice in support of complex employment and ADA discrimination cases.

Representative Matters:

  • Compelled Applebee’s to drop its hidden requirement that all customers pay at least a 20% tip (Ghee v. Apple-Metro, Inc., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13112, 2018 WL 575326);
  • Compelled the City of New York to retrofit 15 intersections to make them accessible to blind people (West v. The City Of New York, No. 1:16-cv-02299-CM-BCM (S.D.N.Y.));
  • Compelled food manufacturer to reduce the size of its container so that consumers would know how much food was enclosed inside. (Cairo et al v. Quest Nutrition, LLC, No. 8:17cv137 (C.D. Cal.));
  • Represented car owners against manufacturer who produced defective and dangerous airbags (In Re: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation, Master Case No. 1:15-MD-02599-FAM);
  • Represented car owners in a case against General Motors regarding its defective air conditioners and the company’s failure to notify consumers of the issue and rectify it (Won v. General Motors Company, No. 1:17-cv-04819-AMD-JO);
  • In a labor law action, obtained court authorization for notice to be sent to plaintiffs with binding arbitration contracts and subsequently defeated motion to disqualify the firm from representing those plaintiffs in arbitration. (Garcia v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14140, 2019 WL 358503);
  • Successfully responded to accusation that client committed breach of contract, causing plaintiff to drop its lawsuit against the client (Joseph V. Dr. Martens Airwair USA LLC, 2:16-cv-06335-LDD (E.D. Pa.)).

Prior to joining Siri & Glimstad, Mr. Rabkin was a Litigation Associate at Lee Litigation, PLLC. He is also the former Associate Editor at the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, where he developed his interests in computer programming and robotics.

Mr. Rabkin graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles with a Bachelor of Arts in History. He obtained his Juris Doctorate from the Columbia University School of Law.

Contact Us

THE METLIFE BUILDING
200 PARK AVENUE
SEVENTEENTH FLOOR
NEW YORK, NY 10166

PHONE:
(
212) 532-1091
FACSIMILE:
(646) 417-5967

Disclaimer

Attorney Advertising Disclaimer: The material on this web site has been prepared and is copyrighted by Siri & Glimstad LLP (“SG”). The material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The material is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up to date.  Information provided by or cited to third parties does not necessarily reflect the opinions of SG or any of its attorneys or clients.

Jurisdictions In Which Our Attorneys Are Licensed To Practice: SG has an office in New York. Members of the firm practice in federal district courts throughout the United States. SG attorneys are licensed to practice in the state(s) enumerated on their individual attorney profiles.

Disclaimer On Contract Formation: Your receipt of the information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, a contract for representation by SG. This information is not intended to substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. No person should act or rely on any information in this site without seeking the advice of an attorney.   Also, please be aware that the sending of an e-mail message to SG does not contractually obligate SG to represent you as your attorney. SG cannot serve as your counsel in any matter unless you and our firm expressly agree, in writing, that we will serve as your attorney.

Statute Of Limitations Notice: You should be aware that the Statute of Limitations (the deadline imposed by law within which you may bring a lawsuit) may severely limit the time remaining for you to file any potential claims you may have.

This Is An Advertisement: This web site may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Independent Investigation: All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer’s credentials and ability being considered, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Our attorneys are not certified as specialists in any particular field of law.

Siri & Glimstad Does Not Offer Any Guarantees Of Case Results: Every legal matter is different. The outcome of each legal case depends upon many factors, including the facts of the case, and no attorney can guarantee a positive result in any case. Any testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Notice On Contingent Fees: SG represents clients in certain cases on a contingent fee basis. In such cases, no fee will be charged in the absence of recovery. However, in the event of an adverse verdict or decision, the contingent fee litigant may be responsible for court costs.

Statement Of Client’s Rights: The Appellate Divisions of the State of New York have enacted a Statement of Client’s Rights and Statement of Client’s Responsibilities which are available at www.nysba.org  If you have any questions about the content of either of these documents, please let us know.

Image Notice: No persons pictured on this website are clients of SG.